Oscar nominations were released today and the internet is in a flurry. Some are excited and relieved that their favourite stars or films were nominated for their performances this year. Others were shocked and upset that their chosen performer did not receive the Academy stamp of approval.
So let us take a look at what we have in store this year. I decided to do a breakdown of the top five categories in the ceremony. Each post will have a breakdown of every nominee in each of these categories. These opinions are mine, and I encourage everyone to add their own.
Remember, the 86th Annual Academy Awards airs on March 2nd, and we will be in good hands with Ellen DeGeneres once again at the helm.
American Hustle: David O Russell's second offering in as many years stampeded through the Golden Globes, scooping up three awards, including Best Motion Picture: Musical Or Comedy. While the performances by the ensemble cast have been praised by most, the film was at times referred to as all pizzaz and no substance. The costumes, music and pouting seem to be enough to carry this movie into the nominations, but can a few good performances push it to the top? Given responses by the Globes, and Critics Choice, this could be a very hot pick,
The Wolf Of Wall Street: Martin Scorcese's fun and flirtatious adaptation of Jordan Belfort's true to life book received huge criticism for 'glamourising' and 'glorifying' the world of investment fraud. Indeed, the film did lack the distinct feeling of remorse presented in the novel. However, this three hour parade demonstrates not just humour and drama (a powerhouse combination), but it startles the audience into enjoying the reality of the entire story. Having said that, and given DiCaprio's strained history with the Academy, this film will either kill or be killed this year.
Captain Phillips: Here we have another film based on a true story, therefore we can assume that the reality of it resonated with it's viewers. Famously snubbed by the Oscars for this year, Tom Hanks offered a notable performance which takes us back to his 'Cast Away' days. He is overshadowed however by newcomers, most specifically Barkhad Abdi as the deranged Somalian pirate Muse. Abdi received a nod from the academy. However, with a lack of nomination in the Best Director category, it seems unlikely that this will take the prize.
Dallas Buyers Club: Well, didn't this gem just get a nod all around? Nominated in acting categories, as well as Best Director, Film Editing, Screenplay, and Hairstyling. A pretty incredible scoop. The film itself plays upon an incredibly serious topic, and one which should have a pretty solid social impact. In watching it, we can almost feel that the subject matter, AIDS, is a metaphor for the diseases that are eating us all: drugs, alcohol, promiscuity, cancer.. you name it. Ticking all the boxes, this could truly be a dark horse.
Gravity: Alfonso Cuaron's latest offering is less science fiction (as the plot would suggest) and more a story of pure survival. Cuaron took out Best Director at the Golden Globes and deservedly so: everything from the cinematography, to the music, and even the performance given by Sandra Bullock (who carried the entire film as almost a lone actor, not an easy task) was primed to perfection. Gravity will certainly sweep contenders under the rug in the technical categories, but could the Academy have a science fiction drama take out Best Film?
Her: While this film has a good message, and serves as perhaps a warning to us all of our reliance on technology, it's quirky nature really does some damage in terms of the Academy and their voting structure. This is a film that you either love or hate. It should win for Best Original Song, but was unfortunately passed up in the cinematography category which is one of the film's main strengths.
Nebraska: 'The Artist' famously took out the Oscar for Best Picture when it delighted audiences with the very fact that they could, in this day and age, still enjoy a black and white film. The film certainly has enough nominations in the acting category to justify a win, and Director Alexander Payne even got the nod, but the true let down here is the lack of technical celebration. There is no back end to the film, and without broad support it does lag behind.
Philomena: This is the token film with heart in this year's nominations. Poignant, witty, and exceptionally British, Philomena has received rave reviews and Judi Dench has been recognised as one of the most stellar performances of the year. Again adapted from a novel (the adaptation has received a nomination for screenwriting) the story is one that will tug on the heart and mind of anyone who watches it. The sole representative for British films, though, it perhaps lacks the glamour or relationship to the Academy to go all the way.
12 Years A Slave: This film resonates in it's dark social significance. While the film is difficult to watch, it tests the audience's emotion and leaves many feeling truly disturbed. Let's not forget that it's sweep of nominations in multiple categories places it as a worthy contender. Many did not watch this film due to it's graphic and at times almost unwatchable content, however with the absence of similar films like 'Mandela' and 'The Butler', this could leave room for 12 Years A Slave to snatch the top prize.
It Should Be… 'The Wolf Of Wall Street'